Move dpv2 to the current platform and dpv1 to first - #19
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Tim Paine <3105306+timkpaine@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
dpv1 read as the proven present and dpv2 as the next thing. dpv2 is what
runs today: it carries the same designs at wider reads and eight parallel
lanes, and the fused temporal-finance workflow measures 11.5 ms against
31.4 ms for the same workload on an 18-core laptop, bit-exact. The proof
section now leads with that while keeping the dpv1 OHLCV origin result in
past tense, and dpv3 reads as planned rather than a concept.
Also corrects a factual error: dpv2 was listed with 8 GB of DDR3. The
board has 2 GB — the platform config is the source of truth and says
2147483648 bytes.
The card styling already encoded the intended hierarchy (dpv2 highlighted,
dpv3 dashed and faded), so only the labels and copy moved. The e2e test
asserted the old labels; it now asserts the new ones plus the measured
figure, so the headline result cannot silently disappear.